Has anyone else noticed that nowadays, you don't ACTUALLY pick up a newspaper to read the news. Newspapers and tabloids in particular seem to think that it is OK to sensationalise the facts purely to sell newspapers. It doesn't seem to ACTUALLY matter if it is real fact or not. (all the better if it involved Paris Hilton or Pete Docherty, or the new stick on the block, Amy Whine-House)
Take the sad case of missing Madeleine McCann. The pap press have taken great delight in this case, which in itself is disgusting. What is worse, however, is that every day a new headline screams out at us. She's Alive. She's Dead. Like it is a proved statement. How utterly disgusting. How upsetting for her parents and family to read this sensationalist crap every day.
They basically hear a snippet of what a bloke who knows a bloke who went out with someone who works on reception at the local Portuguese police station who said .... well, you get my drift.
Really, the fact of the matter is, that we DON'T know what has happened. They can't report the news because there isn't any. And even if there was, this is a criminal investigation and there shouldn't BE details in the paper. it could easily jeopardise any further investigations. And woe betide anyone who is suspected of this crime. You have your name in the paper and may we well have GUILTY tattooed on your forehead with newsprint. It will never come off.
It seems in the past few years that newspapers don't actually care about their readers. I shouldn't HAVE to buy a broadsheet just to expect that what I happen to read on a discarded tabloid on the tube or in the local caff is actually true, surely? I know any of this stuff should be take with a pinch of salt, and I never believe everything I read, but with such important issues being reported, don't they have some sort of duty not to misinform people?
Take the whole 'Princess' Diana fiasco. The press have perpetuated the whole thing, until no-one really knows what is fact and what is wild speculation. Even TV has now got in on the act and creates sensationalist documentaries assuming a lot and reporting nothing. The inquest goes on and on and the papers drag up even more snippets of 'the real story', 'the unspoken truth' and even discover new witnesses, that strangely do not get reported on the news and simply disappear into tomorrow's chip paper.
Are not the real criminals in all of these things, the press?